Etiquette in Society, in Business, in Politics, and at Home
📘 About This Book
Many who scoff at a book of etiquette would be shocked to hear the least expression of levity touching the Ten Commandments. But the Commandments do not always prevent such virtuous scoffers from dealings with their neighbor of which no gentleman could be capable and retain his claim to the title. Though it may require ingenuity to reconcile their actions with the Decalogue--the ingenuity is always forthcoming. There is no intention in this remark to intimate that there is any higher rule of life than the Ten Commandments; only it is illuminating as showing the relationship between manners and morals, which is too often overlooked. The polished gentleman of sentimental fiction has so long served as the type of smooth and conscienceless depravity that urbanity of demeanor inspires distrust in ruder minds. On the other hand, the blunt, unpolished hero of melodrama and romantic fiction has lifted brusque-ness and pushfulness to a pedestal not wholly merited. Consequently, the kinship between conduct that keeps us within the law and conduct that makes civilized life worthy to be called such, deserves to be noted with emphasis. The Chinese sage, Confucius, could not tolerate the suggestion that virtue is in Itself enough without politeness, for he viewed them as inseparable and **saw courtesies as coming from the heart," maintaining that *Vhen they are practised with all the heart, a moral elevation ensues. "
📖 Summary
Emily Price Post’s monumental work, Etiquette in Society, in Business, in Politics, and at Home, published in 2007, spans a comprehensive 684 pages addressing the intricate tapestry of human interaction and moral duty. Often dismissed by skeptics as a superficial guide for the overly scrupulous, the text defends manners not as mere vanity, but as a crucial external expression of internal virtue and foundational human decency. The author draws a compelling parallel between societal rules and the Ten Commandments, noting that while many hold strict religious tenets in high regard, they may simultaneously fail in their everyday dealings with neighbors in ways that no true gentleman would tolerate. People frequently use clever ingenuity to justify actions that violate the spirit of good character, even while claiming adherence to higher moral laws. The book illuminates the deep, overlooked relationship between manners and morals, directly challenging the harmful fiction trope that a polished and urbane gentleman is inherently synonymous with smooth, conscienceless depravity. By dismantling the false dichotomy between outward urbanity and genuine goodness, Post invites readers to see that proper conduct, thoughtful consideration for others, and refined social graces are entirely compatible with—and indeed supportive of—a deeply principled life. Across its vast pages, the work examines how these principles apply universally across various spheres of modern existence, guiding individuals on how to navigate complex social hierarchies, business environments, political arenas, and intimate domestic spaces with grace, integrity, and unwavering respect for their fellow human beings.
🎯 Key Lessons
⚖️ Pros & Cons
✅ Pros
Provides deep insight into the moral foundation of manners.
Covers a remarkably wide range of life domains.
Challenges common fictional stereotypes about polite individuals.
Offers timeless reflections on human interaction and integrity.
⚠️ Cons
May be overly dense for readers seeking quick tips.
Lengthy format requires dedicated attention.
❓ FAQ
Who is the author of this book? +
The book was authored by Emily Price Post.
How many pages does this edition have? +
This edition contains 684 pages.
What is the primary theme regarding manners? +
The text explores the relationship between manners and morals, showing that good etiquette reflects genuine character.
Does the book address business and politics? +
Yes, it covers etiquette across society, business, politics, and the home.
Why do some people scoff at books on etiquette? +
Some skeptics view them as superficial, wrongly separating outward urbanity from internal virtue.





